User:Rmhermen
 | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
| Action | Count |
|---|---|
| Edits | 61495 |
| Edits+Deleted | 64852 |
| Pages deleted | 3958 |
| Revisions deleted | 14 |
| Pages restored | 30 |
| Pages protected | 80 |
| Pages unprotected | 9 |
| Protections modified | 23 |
| Users blocked | 101 |
| Users reblocked | 1 |
| User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 74.194.126.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:8c0:480:67c0:5457:4511:184a:d05a (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2804:49A4:4007:6D00:1DDD:70A2:FE57:9EE2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On List of French serial killers: Repeated disruptive and unsourced changes (always the same ones) on the mentioned page, no other constructive contributions, doesn't engage on the talk page. I suggest a temporary block, at least from the article in question. Gawaon (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- IhatenighjerskiIIaIInighjersheil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vagrdyuy9 (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Vandalism + confessing to being a sock on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vagrdyuy9. Note that I had already reported them to UAA for the egregious username violation before the made those edits. MCE89 (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Markmilleyalexander (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) posted a telegram link to the start of a few random articles such as Arthur St. Clair or Tenasserim spadefoot toadDevilsTaxiDrivr (talk) 04:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- MarylandStaff876 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(admin|coordinator|bureaucrat|check *user|developer|moderator|oversight|steward|sysop|committee|staff)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Name may imply a position of authority -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Willow3d Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Шерзодбек шокирович (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- TheWrld'sGreatestDetective (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- MassDOTComms (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Softblock required. They came into IRC live chat looking for help with draft, good faith editor. qcne (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- TimmyTheBleachDrinker (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. TLJ7863 (talk) 19:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- IhatenighjerskiIIaIInighjersheil (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. Blatantly offensive username. They haven't edited yet but I felt that this probably falls into the "egregious" category. MCE89 (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Per WP:RUSUKR Mr. Komori (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 09:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/IRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Is there any disruption to the article? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As implied above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Is there any disruption to the article? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The flags on this page have been changing back and forth since October. In December 2024, IP users (or user) started getting involved and continued to change them without reason. Catalyst GP real (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: article is subject to WP:1RR per WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism and bad editing on article as well as reverting reminiscent of an edit war. Vandalism on talk page Sushidude21! (talk) 13:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Continuous unreferenced edits from IP users.[1][2][3] Hotwiki (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No reverts on article for a couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: CTOP - AMPOL sanctions. Don't know what the normal protection level is for AMPOL. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 18:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- AP2 does not have a blanket 500/30 restriction to my knowledge. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not logging as a CTOPS action yet but I will leave a notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Sockpuppet user constantly adding hoax information. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Top_Gun_X_4. CoconutOctopus talk 21:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit waring. Discombobulates (talk) 22:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Cryptid. For a week. In full. Wow. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High levels of IP vandalism, likely by the same person. Sushidude21! (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary protection (extended confirmed) due to recent edit warring between multiple users. Likely the product of his upcoming birth anniversary. Yue🌙 22:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: SuvGh (talk · contribs) blocked by The Bushranger. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Oh boy, it's me again. The questionable salute has led to heated debate and is a contentious topic at the moment. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 23:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wildfireupdateman: Could you please provide some diffs of problematic edits? Thanks. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Elon_Musk&diff=prev&oldid=1270818666
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Elon_Musk&oldid=1270888912
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Elon_Musk&diff=prev&oldid=1270701713 Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 00:05, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Since we now have the main article on indef ECP+1RR. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long history of COI editing and promotion. See username of this editor, [4], [5], [6], recent edit warring [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]. --Richard Yin (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 23:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think it's worth considering protecting the page anyway, given that this has gone on for years across multiple accounts/IPs. --Richard Yin (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined for now as, since I blocked the account causing trouble today, it was the first significant editing to the article in three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think it's worth considering protecting the page anyway, given that this has gone on for years across multiple accounts/IPs. --Richard Yin (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism, due to recent events (J6 pardons). This and other J6 pages likely to be targets for forseeable future -FactsheetPete (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For now, given that the article has not previously needed protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Preemptive measure due to rampant J6 related vandalism. -FactsheetPete (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – consistent changes (unsourced) from multiple IPs over time. It is constant disruption of the article. ButlerBlog (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Isabelle Belato. for a month. Semi. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High Level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs making similar disruptive edits. Wburrow (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long term vandalism spanning several years. -FactsheetPete (talk) 00:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – has been going on since November. Kajmer05 (talk) 01:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of the rest of the time on the current protection, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on page per WP:CT/CID. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or improperly sourced content. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered users keep removing the 'anti-colonialism' from the infobox, while keeping the reference intact. therefore I request semi protection, most useful edits have been done by registered users. – Nar 2608 – 02:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 02:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Already extended-confirmed protected, but should also be move-protected while the redirect discussion regarding "Gulf of America" is still underway. Ithinkiplaygames (talk) 02:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: A number of IPs have been vandalizing the talk page, either treating it as a forum post to talk about their reactions to her sermon, and a partially blocked IP calling The Rt Rev. some pretty crass & gendered insults (namely demanding that there be a section added calling her [derogatory term removed]). This is pretty plainly not the point of a talk page and is disruptive & harmful. 96.231.129.14 (talk) 02:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, my apologies for repeating the term, I shouldn't have done that, that's my bad! Figured it was useful for documentation purposes in the moment but it's on the talk page after all, and best not to have that floating around here too, thank you for that! 96.231.129.14 (talk) 02:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- I endorse the report by the IP that the attack language at the talk page has gotten out of hand and violates BLP. However, it has not reached the any-reasonable-admin threshold where I feel comfortable acting, as I have a borderline COI with TEC. —C.Fred (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – String of recent vandalism. Amigao (talk) 02:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After disrupting Kabyle people to the point where it needed EC protection, the highly disruptive SP master Noname_JR moved to this one, first by using Special:Contributions/Dotabetterthanlol and now, resorting to IP socking (their IP range is known). M.Bitton (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Require semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism. Hbanm (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The edit includes a source from the Department of Defense Inspector General and the page isn't allowed to include that source. Airman79 (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Airman79: This request is a request to lower protection on a title that isn't protected, and reads more like an edit request. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is no Wikipedia page for Dave Isaacson. Most likely the requester intended to refer to David Isaacson. Still, that is not a page under any form of protection. EdJohnston (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Remove: "Historians and political scientists rank Biden as above average in historical rankings of American presidents."
Way too soon to suggest that in the main text of the article! He has barely left office, its going to be at least a few months before such a bold claim can be made. Is there really enough historians and political scientists saying this to justify this claim? BlunanNation (talk) 08:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Currently, the lede states "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, taking 251 captive, against which Israelis responded applying the controversial Hannibal Directive, resulting in the death of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, among which 815 civilians.". This implies that the majority of the casualties were caused by Israel applying the Hannibal Directive, and despite some cases of casualties due to this, no credible source has made the claim that the majority of casualties originate from it. I suggest changing the lede back to what it was before it was randomly edited to the current lede without any discussion on the talk page about it, to "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, killing 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals and taking 251 captive." Aradkipod (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
330+ article creations with zero deletions. Have run into this editor's creations in New Page Review and do not have to do repairs; infoboxes, categories, wikilinks, short descriptions, talk pages, etc. are all in place. This editor does not need to be in the new pages feed. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Fixing typos (乛-乛) (talk) 10:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Fixing typos Clubette (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights to edit and correct information on wikipedia Maximus O (talk) 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hey, I would like to apply for the NPR rights. As I have created more than 50 pages and I'm actively involved in reviewing drafts since last week of December 2024, you can check my reviewed articles here and the articles I putted up for deletion can be seen here. My primary focus are the articles related to Women, Politics, India, Poetry, Writers and Indian activists. I do sometime revert bad faith edits. I will contribute to the Wikipedia with NPR rights, same as I have contributed through the AFC Reviewer rights. Thanks and Regards. Taabii (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
As a wikipedia contributor, I have created several wikipedia articles and committed several edits to improve the wikipedia articles. I would love to contribute as a New page reviewer and it will help me to expand my contributions to Wikipedia. Ensconce (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Well, I'm requesting this right to protect Wikipedia from Vandals. By the way the 1 of the 2 revisions (both not accepted) in Curry was unaccepted without any reason and other maybe due to some misunderstanding by the reviewer of the WP:NOINDICSCRIPT & both were good faith.Although I am look as a newcomer, but this is a clean start account. If there is any other objection, I'll try to be explainable for it. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
I had the PCR userright, which was granted last year (request). While I had the flag, I didn't use it very much, so I requested the removal of the flag, which was granted. Since then, I keep finding myself looking at Special:PendingChanges and wanting to mark edits as reviewed. (Note that I also have rollback perms.) Thank you for your time and consideration! Relativity ⚡️ 01:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at PendingChanges, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the criteria for its use, especially in regard to BLP and countering vandalism. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. Additionally, I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions, and finally – as for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
To review changes on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. — W.andrea (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello, I was temporarily granted rollback permissions to see how I do, and they are due to expire on the 27th. I believe I have been diligent and careful with this permission, and I only use it when necessary. I always warn users and I create discussions on article talk pages where necessary. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 14:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
 |
WP:AIV |  |
WP:ANI |  |
WP:NPP |  |
WP:RPP |  |
WP:RFR |  |
WP:AFD |  |
WP:XFD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
CAT:CSD |  |
WP:CSD |  |
WP:RM |  |
WP:RAA |  |
WP:DR |  |
WP:TM |  |
WP:TT | ||||||
 |
WP:RCU |  |
WP:LOP |  |
CAT:AB |  |
WP:BS |  |
WP:RD |  |
WP:NFC |  |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [15] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]
Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system
